brotherpeacemaker

It's about our community and our spirituality!

Gran Torino Is Better Left In The Past

grantorino

Leonard Pitts of The Miami Herald wrote an article about Clint Eastwood’s latest flick Gran Torino.  Gran Torino is about Walt Kowalski, a regular guy who is a retired assembly line worker from one of the Ford assembly plants.  It’s a fair bet that judging from the title of the film Mr. Kowalski worked in the plant that used to make the Gran Torino and its Mercury counterpart, the Montego.  Mr. Kowalski is a man with as much racial sensitivity as a klan member at a klan rally.  He has no problem wearing his racism on his sleeve and holding it up for all to see.

Mr. Pitts appears to admire Mr. Kowalski for his natural talent to buck the trend for political correctness and public sensitivity.  Mr. Pitts remarks that “in the United States of the Aggrieved, there is no malady, mark, mannerism, mindset or malformation too miscellaneous to have its own support group, along with a cadre of lobbyists and lawyers hyper vigilant for any suggestion of mistreatment or actionable discrimination.”  And this is supposed to be a bad thing.

Reading the article I get the impression that Mr. Pitts, an African American, sometimes longs for the era where racial prejudice and discrimination was more in your face, openly practiced by more people.  In his article he told the story of how he showed a class of college students an episode of All in the Family featuring Carroll O’Conner as the over the top bigot Archie Bunker.  The classroom of students was offended.  I’m assuming that they didn’t find the episode the least bit funny.  Mr. Pitts admitted that his assertion that the show was hilarious and a satire of bigotry were unable to convince the students that the program had qualities of redemption.  To paraphrase Mr. Pitts, sometimes he thinks it is progress but other times it is something else entirely.

The movie features an exchange between Mr. Kowalski and his Italian barber.  The two trade insults about each other’s ancestry in a good natured slur exchange.  Black people have a history of doing the same thing with yo’ mama jokes and other insult exchanges done for jest.  There is nothing offensive here.  Mr. Kowalski will still come to his Italian barber friend for a haircut and the Italian barber would go to his friend Kowalski whenever he needs that which Mr. Kowalski can provide.  Mr. Pitts refers to this white on white banter as a nostalgic reference to a less touchy time where friendly insults helped to pass the time of day.

But I wonder how friendly those insults would be considered if they were uttered from a black man.  Would Mr. Kowalski be ready to look at a black man’s insulting his family with the same sense of humor?  Somehow I doubt it.  Like Mr. Pitts explained before these insults can be accepted as nothing more than jest there must be some reserve of trust and affection that makes the insult harmless and without malice.  How much malice would there be from a white person with a serious superiority complex over minorities in the heart or vice versa.  Imagine someone like Archie Bunker trading friendly insults with a black man.  Nothing humorous or satire like even comes close to mind.  All I can imagine is Mr. Bunker getting his buddies together and making some black person pay or a lot of black people pay for the crime of some uppity nigger having the audacity to think he’s as good as white people.

I used to love those cars.  My oldest brother had a white 1974 Gran Torino Elite two door coupe with a black vinyl top and a 5.7 liter Windsor V8.  And watching the most famous Torino of all, that red and white Gran Torino Sport weave through streets and chasing criminals in Starsky and Hutch was pretty cool to a young and impressionable adolescent whose mom drove a 1968 Pontiac Catalina Executive station wagon with a whopping 6.6 liter V8 but something like four tons of sheet metal to motivate into any semblance of locomotion while dad drove a 1972 Dodge Dart with a woefully underpowered straight six that would have trouble outracing a freshly napped five year old on a Big Wheel.  Other than that big engine on the wagon and air conditioning my parents’ cars were void of any factory options.  I lived vicariously through shows like Starsky and Hutch.

But that was more than thirty years ago.  Cars have gotten significantly better over the years.  Now that I have a more sophisticated appreciation for what makes an automobile great I can say without a doubt that the only thing a Torino would have for me is that it represent a time when I was much younger and dumber.  Would I like a classic Gran Torino in perfect condition sitting in my driveway?  Not really.  I’d prefer a nice little Honda Fit or a Honda Civic coupe.  I can feed my nostalgia for classic cars by going to an automobile museum or a car show.  A Gran Torino wouldn’t have much of a place in my life right now.

I think I’d prefer the nostalgia for white people’s crassness the same way.  I suffer from no allusion that somehow things were better back in the day when white people were much freer to run roughshod over black people and their rights.  If I ever become nostalgic to see white people insult black people with impunity I’ll get a copy of To Kill a Mockingbird or watch Gone With the Wind or the virtually unlimited supply of movies where black people do nothing but cheesing for the camera or dancing a jig with Shirley Temple or getting a whip to their backside because some white person needed to release their frustration.  But to go back to a time when white people are free to insult black people without controversy?  I don’t need such strife in my life right now or ever.

Friday, January 16, 2009 - Posted by | African Americans, Bigotry, Black Community, Black Culture, Black People, Cars, Life, Racism, Thoughts |

14 Comments »

  1. Clint Eastwood is going to get alot of old white people killed because of this role. Somehow I’m getting flashbacks of Eddie Murphy’s “Raw” when he spoke of Italian dudes seeing the movie “Rocky”.

    Comment by RiPPa | Friday, January 16, 2009 | Reply

    • Thanks for the feedback RiPPa,

      That would be a funny thought if it wasn’t so true. My initial reaction was to laugh because I remembered Eddie Murphy talking about little Italian guys with IROC-Z’s walking around picking fights with black guys. But laughter was quickly replaced with dismay. People like Joe Horn of Texas who get away with the murder of black people simply because it was black people.

      Peace

      Comment by brotherpeacemaker | Friday, January 16, 2009 | Reply

  2. Hey the first thing I thought of after seeing the commercials is that they did a movie about the life of Joe Horn. Shooting minorities in the back as they run across his front lawn.

    I have been having thoughts about the whole “good ole days” crap. I always to tell people when they start getting all nostalgic about those days is that they weren’t so good for some of the people back then.

    Yet, the people reminiscing will always have another story about how they mean a simpler kinder time. And again I have to ask what is so kind about lynching, blatant racism and the trampling of civil rights.

    Nope, these type of movies haven’t done anything to spark my lust for the “good ole days.”

    Thanks

    Comment by theblacksentinel | Friday, January 16, 2009 | Reply

  3. Thanks for the feedback theblacksentinel,

    Indeed, while many white people back in the day were being portrayed in a kinder simpler time, black people were dealing with some of the most blatant institutionalized racism. Leave It To Beaver and Happy Days and American Graffiti may have centered around white people hanging out at the soda shop and such. But lord knows that chances are if a black person showed up at one of those joints they wouldn’t remember it as a good time. These times weren’t happy days at all for black people.

    Peace

    Comment by brotherpeacemaker | Friday, January 16, 2009 | Reply

  4. My guess is that Mr. Pitts sees our society as being a bit too stilted and stiff; people can’t seem to loosen up with one another or even make fun of themselves.

    Example: last night I went to see Monty Python’s Spamalot. In the show, the Knights of Ni gave King Aurthur a task: produce a play and get it to Broadway.

    Then they did a number which said that they didn’t have a chance at making Broadway as they didn’t have any Jews on the cast.

    In the midst of this, King Aurthur’s servant admitted that he was Jewish. Aurthur asked why he didn’t say so earlier and the servant replied: “admitting to being Jewish is not something you do around a heavily armed Christian”

    I suppose that Mr. Pitts was thinking that this sort of thing has some merit to it?

    I don’t think that Mr. Pitts is longing for the days were some folks were excluded from parts of society based on race, and he certainly sees nothing funny about getting threats based on ones race; you were aware that he was openly targeted by Neo-Nazis, right? (good news: that Neo Nazi is cooling his heels in Federal Prison awaiting trial)

    All in the Family: I admit that I found Archie Bunker to be hilarious; in no way was bigotry being lionized. It was being condemned.

    Comment by blueollie | Friday, January 16, 2009 | Reply

  5. Clint Eastwood used his outward crankiness to come across as tough and yet also heroic at the same time, well done i’d say

    Comment by coffee | Friday, January 16, 2009 | Reply

  6. Blueollie,

    The only problem with this is that these jokes become fodder for people’s reality. Remember that minstrels, jigaboo’s and Sambo’s were jokes as well. Now the one thing that you can’t escape is the whole blacks are lazy, blacks are stupid, blacks are less than.

    I am not saying that these things are what started those stereotypes but that is how stereotypes are born. Someone has to come up with a stereotype that becomes the joke about a race. So how do you do that without it being rooted in racism?

    Now I can see the merit in a more loose and free society but with the race problems that we have, we will not be enjoying any of that until we can finally have equality. And we all know that that is still a ways away.

    Racism is the rape of a person’s dignity. And I don’t think that many people would see the humor of chronicling the life of a blatant rapist. Yet, people find humor in chronicling the life of a blatant bigot or racist. Why?

    The reason I believe this is because we actually don’t see racism as that bad. Archie Bunker and his show was victimless. Meaning that they only showed things from the side of this fictional “funny” bigot. Where are the fictional victims of his bigotry? Why don’t we ask them how funny his behavior was?

    Thanks

    Comment by theblacksentinel | Friday, January 16, 2009 | Reply

    • Thanks for the feedback blueollie,

      But there is nothing funny about bigotry. That’s the problem, people think bigotry is something to be depicted as a cartoon or satire. There are people who look at the antics of racism displayed on television and used them as a foundation for their racial expressions. It’s like the people who do copy cat crimes of racism. They see one person hang a noose and all of a sudden nooses are going up in a number of locations. And the fact that it was intended as satire really doesn’t matter. No thank you. I’d rather see this type of thing left alone.

      Peace

      Comment by brotherpeacemaker | Friday, January 16, 2009 | Reply

  7. Different perspectives I guess.

    I grew up and knew people who acted like Archie Bunker and their behavior was accepted. So it just felt good to see that being openly ridiculed on All in the Family.

    Comment by blueollie | Friday, January 16, 2009 | Reply

  8. Peace brother I would like your thoughts about a story i read today (friday) in the new york daily news about some crooked craka. Conned con man avoids can A Manhattan securities broker who stole $600,000 from clients won’t serve a day in prison — because he sas so addled, he gave the money to con artist who’d e-mailed him from Nigeria to say he’d won inheritances and the lottery. Michael Axel, 69 — a con man who got conned — was a heavy drinker for 30 years and suffers from alcohol-induced dementia prosecuters said yesterday as he was sentenced to five years probation. “He is a predator on the elderly” a victims son labor arbitrator Robert Douglas told state Supreme Court Justice Michael Obus calling the no-prison deal “outragous & unconscionable.” But the judge stuck to the sentence noting that while the theft was large, Axel has made restitution and shown remorse and was himself victimized. “I’m very sorry about what I did. I’m deeply embarrassed and humiliated by my actions,” Axel told the court, adding that he has been sober for six months and is taking anit-depressands. His victims included a high-school teacher and a 90-year-old women living in a nursing home. thats not no cut and paste i actually typed the whole article so you could see that i’m not exxagerating. now one of the first things that jumps off the page to me was “Alcohol induced dementia” (I swear to everything i did not make this term up) it’s like they will make up any type of excuse to get these crakas off the hook. So let me get this strait i could go rob a Armored truck and claim that i like to drink they will throw my black ass under the jail a quicker than they will shoot an unarmed black man on the roof of his building(r.i.p Timothy Stansbury) or faster than they would shoot and unarmed black man in the vestibule of his building (r.i.p Amadou Diallo) or maybe i’d be under the jail quiker than they could kill a young man on his wedding day (r.i.p Sean Bell) they might even throw my ass under the jail faster than they could execute a 22 year old kid laying face down on the pavement then they want to be leinent because he himself was conned. Its almost laghable i’m sorry this comment is so long but i don’t think you will mind to much i hope not anyway

    Comment by keith | Friday, January 16, 2009 | Reply

  9. One of the best movies i’ve seen in years. Full of reality,
    of human struggles. Anybody who sees it as some kind of celebration of older more racist times didnt get the movie at all.
    Clint Eastwood knows the american viewer…he gives first an hour of a “cool flick” so people relax …and then he hits with heavy issues we cant speak about.

    Comment by Ivan "awolalu" | Saturday, January 17, 2009 | Reply

    • Thanks for the feedback Ivan “awolalu”,

      But I’ll stick with the last Batman flick The Dark Knight as a favorite.

      Peace

      Comment by brotherpeacemaker | Saturday, January 17, 2009 | Reply

  10. […] Leonard Pitts column caused some conversation between me and my wife and evidently in the blogosphere as […]

    Pingback by 17 January 2009 « blueollie | Saturday, January 17, 2009 | Reply

  11. I was actually inspired by the movie. Many of the comments here show that people miss an important part of the movie–the guy is going to die of cancer very soon. This is where the impetus to do something about the thugs comes from. Not from a prejudice against minorities.

    Also, using racial slurs when confronting gangs with firearms is a scare tactic, not an act of hatred or bigotry. It “ups the ante” in the confrontation.

    Comment by shawn | Saturday, April 25, 2009 | Reply


Leave a comment