It's about our community and our spirituality!

The Real Anthony Weiner

A fourth woman has come forward to admit her participation in the texting scandal surrounding embattled New York House Representative Anthony Weiner. The situation is truly unfortunate. Not because Mr. Weiner, once considered an up and coming star in the Democratic Party, participated in some gravely inappropriate behavior. What makes this so sordid is the fact that when busted, Mr. Weiner took to lying about it like a duck takes to water. My twitter account was hacked! I can’t say for sure if it was me or not! This is all just a political attack by enemies! There needs to be an investigation to see who’s doing this! In the end, threatened with irrefutable evidence to prove Mr. Weiner’s guilt, the man tearfully admits the truth and apologizes to everybody. Once his house of cards crashed his first priority was to say how sorry he was for his lack of prudence. But his second priority was to tell people that he wasn’t about to quit his job.

As an employee of the people, Mr. Weiner really should think about rethinking his decision to stay and fight to keep his job. His desire to stay in his position of power is a natural one. 99 times out of a hundred, any time a politician is caught red handed with his or her hand in the proverbial cookie jar the first reaction is to offer an apology and to act like all we have to do is to go back to business as normal. But the bigger problem is that instead of going ahead and getting in the bed he made for himself, Mr. Weiner slipped into a hard core mode of public deception. He went on all the talk shows to blame everybody and anybody, accusing anyone and everyone for essentially what was the truth. After it was revealed that he had thrown a great deal of his good judgment out the window, he reached for any shred of personal integrity that may have remained and gave it the boot as well. Instead of facing the music, Mr. Weiner doubled down and gave even more energy to the opinion that he does not deserve the trust of his constituents.

Not too long ago I was confronted with my own lack of character. I am still learning to cope with my own lack of discretion. And while the revelation of what I had done was truly painful, I do believe it would have been considerably more painful if I continued to hide my wrongs with even more wrongs. If I can use an analogy, it’s a lot like how one responds to a minor traffic violation. If you get caught for speeding or for running a light, you pull over when you see the police lights behind you and accept your ticket. That’s the right thing to do. You’re busted! The last thing you want to do is put your foot on the gas and try to avoid one minor traffic violation by throwing caution to the wind and intentionally making more traffic violations. There is a very slim change you might get away. But the far greater inevitability is that you will get caught. And instead of thinking about the welfare of others who might be sharing the street with you, you’re willing to risk the safety of the public for your own selfish gain. And then to add insult to public injury, when you are eventually stopped we learn that you are in fact a cop, trusted with the safety of the public. The rabbit hole you just fell down winds up being the Grand Canyon. And if that’s not enough, you want to tell everybody that you’re sorry and have no plans of leaving your cop job as if it’s just business as usual.

If we were only talking about another politician with a penchant for the typical distasteful behavior of abusing the public’s trust, that’s one thing. But to augment that behavior with the outright, brazen shamelessness of high profile deception is a bit inexcusable. And it doesn’t matter who else did it. We’re not here to talk about how Louisiana Senator David Vitter got off or how Nevada Senator John Ensign dodged a bullet. We should learn to stop with the rather ridiculous notion that because somebody escaped punishment in the past we now have lost the moral grounds to shed light on this situation. What happened then really doesn’t apply to the now. And just think, if we handle this situation appropriately, we might be able to set precedence for how we handle such behavior in the future. We have to start dealing with these politicians somewhere.

The way Mr. Weiner handled this whole ordeal is awfully telling. The man didn’t hesitate to go where every politician should fear to tread, brazen lying and accusing everyone else of deceit when the truth is so easily verified. Mr. Weiner should have simply come clean when he was confronted with who he was. Instead, he tried to run from himself by embracing the very behavior that got him into trouble in the first place. A man who embraces duplicity on such a public scale to avoid his duplicity on such a private matter, simply cannot be relied on to do what’s right for the public’s welfare. Mr. Weiner should reconsider his desire to stay at his job and show the world he really does care about the greater good.

Thursday, June 9, 2011 - Posted by | Life, Thoughts


  1. Why doesn’t anyone look at the acts of all of these woman, Woods, Arnold, Swaggert, Lewinsky. These women knew the men were married. Why make them out to be innocent vixens?

    Comment by Paul | Thursday, June 9, 2011 | Reply

    • Thanks for the feedback Paul,

      And you have a very valid point. If these woman were the ones who were entrusted with doing the will of the public or operating with celebrity, I’m sure the situation would be different and they would be the ones under scrutiny. But unfortunately, or fortunately depending on perspective, these women are virtually unknowns who haven’t violated the public’s trust or have not lost their apple pie image that they used to gain fame and fortune. The idea that they are innocents is a false one. They are in themselves predators and should be avoided if a politician, especially a married one, knows what’s good for him.


      Comment by brotherpeacemaker | Thursday, June 9, 2011 | Reply

  2. They always say it is the attempt to cover up that causes the most harm.
    Personally, I’d just as see him serve out his term and not run for reelection; remember that what he did was not an abuse of office nor was it illegal. But I don’t live in his district.

    Comment by blueollie | Thursday, June 9, 2011 | Reply

    • Thanks for the feedback blueollie,

      Mr. Weiner proves that this maxim is very true.

      But whether or not his initial behavior was an abuse of his office or was illegal is moot. What’s troubling is the extent of his denials to cover up his behavior. If it wasn’t an abuse of power or illegal then why would he go to such lengths to cover it up?


      Comment by brotherpeacemaker | Thursday, June 9, 2011 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: