It's about our community and our spirituality!

A Shoe In The Hand Becomes Two At The Bush


Who was it that said that the United States would be greeted in Iraq as liberators?  Who was it that said that President George Bush would have statues built in his honor by the people of Iraq for liberating the country?  If this person meant that George Bush would be liberating people from their shoes then he or she was dead on accurate.  However, it is pretty clear that the Iraqis don’t build statues for shoe liberators.

When I saw the President ducking shoes hurled at his head by the Iraqi journalist Muntazer al-Zaidi, I had to ask how much more evidence do we need that this man’s approval ratings have hit bottom.  According to the news reporter, in Iraq, throwing a shoe at someone is the mother of all insults.  I remember when the statue of Saddam Hussein were pulled down by United State soldiers how so many Iraqi people made considerable effort to use their shoes to hit the statue in its symbolic head.  A shoe to the head appears to be standard procedure for communicating dissatisfaction with someone.

I have to admit to some disappointment that the Iraqi shoe thrower yelled something in his native language drawing the attention of Mr. Bush and giving the President an opportunity to duck the thrown shoes.  It would have been so satisfying for me to see Mr. Zaidi’s Hush Puppies bouncing off of Mr. Bush’s head.  Mr. Bush has some pretty good reflexes, probably honed from all the projectiles hurled by Laura Bush on a regular basis.  Mr. Bush ducked behind the podium and rose back up again with his trademark smirk, more frustrating to see than one of those stupid painted expressions on a whack-a-mole game at a Chucky Cheese pizza.

In an interview that followed, Mr. Bush wanted people to think about the symbolism of what had just happened.  Saddam Hussein would never tolerate anyone throwing a shoe at him.  The thrower, the thrower’s family and friends, and maybe the shoe salesman who sold the shoe to the thrower would disappear to be executed under what could be imagined as the most gruesome of circumstances.  Kind of like what has happened to many Iraqis who found themselves in the custody of American soldiers in Abu Ghraib.

A lot of progress has been made in Iraq.  Mr. Zaidi won’t be executed by Saddam Hussein.  He will only face Iraqi law.  Then again, if Mr. Hussein was in control of Iraq, the Mr. Zaidi wouldn’t be so upset from watching his country getting royally screwed by a foreign invader.  A lot of progress has been made in Iraq.  But there has also been a lot of destruction and corruption and stagnation and regression and death, all at the hands of Mr. Bush.

Hundreds of thousands of Iraqis didn’t have the good fortune of dodging a simple shoe hurled at them by a disgruntled American soldier.  Hundreds of thousand of Iraqis could do little more than duck as megatons of explosives rained from the sky released by American planes of war, easily some of the most sophisticated machines of death made by man.  And for the Pandora’s Box of chaos Mr. Bush has released on the country of Iraq, he gets to duck from a couple of shoes.

The Iraqi government so friendly to Mr. Bush is holding Mr. Zaidi on charges of a barbaric act that insulted the Iraqi state according to Yasin Majeed, the prime minister’s media advisor.  The government said Mr. Zaidi’s ignominious act was not fitting of media demanded an apology from his employer, the independent television station al-Baghdadiya.  But instead the television station demanded Mr. Zaidi’s release, calling the man a hero of the Iraqi people.  The television station played continuous loop of patriotic music with Zaidi’s face plastered across the screen.

For throwing the shoe at Mr. Bush, Mr. Zaidi now faces years in prison.  In all honesty the man attempted little more than attempted assault.  Mr. Bush was not injured in the least.  No one died.  A nation was not destroyed.  Mr. Bush is responsible for heinous crimes against the country of Iraq and is hailed by a puppet government as a hero.  Mr. Zaidi throws a shoe and now faces years behind bars.  Yes it might be true that Mr. Zaidi may have let his passion get the best of him.  He probably deserves punishment.  But does this man truly deserve to spend years behind bars?

It turns out maybe there hasn’t been that much progress made in Iraq after all.  Disparity seems to be alive and kicking in Iraq, as much now as it did back in Mr. Hussein’s day.  It’s this type of discrimination that makes you want to throw your Nikes, Buster Browns, Doc Martins, Stacey Adams, Converses, Nunn Bushes, as well as your Rockports at somebody’s head.  I’m surprised it’s taken so long for someone in Mr. Bush’s vicinity to realize that half the fun of having feet is having two shoes to throw at the most opportune time.

Tuesday, December 16, 2008 - Posted by | George Bush, Iraq, Life, News, Politics, Thoughts


  1. What was most disturbing to me was what I read in USA Today (of all places): from the report, I gathered that while Bush was commented on the Iraqi journalist’s shoe size and talking about the freedom to protest brought to Iraq thanks to the USA, the screams of the shoe-thrower being beaten by the police could be heard in the background. An updated report quoted the journalist’s brother saying that he believed his brother didn’t show up in court because he had been too severely beaten. So much for the freedom to protest.

    Comment by Betsy | Wednesday, December 17, 2008 | Reply

  2. Thanks for the feedback Betsy,

    People don’t realize that there were people in Iraq protesting against their government prior to the American invasion. But just like we saw the other day, if you get caught protesting against the government, you were caught and prosecuted.

    The only thing that has really changed in Iraq is that people are free to express their anger at their old form of government now that a new one is in place. It’s not that the people have the freedom to protest against their new government. Like always, people have the freedom to protest and get their ass kicked by whomever is their government.


    Comment by brotherpeacemaker | Wednesday, December 17, 2008 | Reply

  3. An update – the New York Times today put the beating of the journalist as “a rumor” that they could not substantiate. So I have my doubts about USA Today’s version, but then rumors sometimes have a basis — and sometimes they don’t. Fact checking is not easy.

    Comment by Betsy | Wednesday, December 17, 2008 | Reply

    • Betsy,

      I must admit how little faith I have in a publication like the USA Today. This is one of the papers that was little more than a cheerleader for the Bush administration in its push for the war on terror. When various news reporters and journalists should’ve been asking questions, they were more than happy to rollover and publish what the administration said verbatim. And simply because it cannot be substantiated does not mean that it didn’t happen. For years the link to cigarette smoking and cancer couldn’t be substantiated. Therefore a lot of people felt that it didn’t exist. Fact checking may not be easy but it is so worth the effort.


      Comment by brotherpeacemaker | Thursday, December 18, 2008 | Reply

  4. It’s really too bad he missed, but it’s better than never have tossed at all!

    Comment by Vigilante | Saturday, December 27, 2008 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: