President Barack Obama learned a long time ago of the dangers associated with being a black politician at a national level and vocalizing anything about the institutionalized racism of the United States. While obviously racially non black politicians are free to remind the public of America’s racial shortcomings, a black politician doesn’t have that luxury out of some perception that the black politician would appear too close to the black community. When such an observation starts to manifest, the fear is that the black community’s need would trump the white community’s wants and America would never tolerate such a circumstance. It wouldn’t matter if the entire black community was slipping further into the oblivion of poverty and all the social ills associated with that condition, if white America wants ice cream somebody better make sure there’s a national plan to provide ice cream. To hell with black people!
When the news broke that candidate Barack Obama’s pastor Reverend Jeremiah Wright was a closet racist who hated white people, regardless of how inaccurate the story was, Mr. Obama had to stiff arm his spiritual mentor for his political survival. When Mr. Obama weighed in on the arrest of his friend Henry Louis “Skip” Gates, Jr. and called the behavior of the Cambridge police stupid for arresting the prominent black American out of his own house, Mr. Obama was so vilified by his political opponents and many across the country that he had to back pedal his comments like Michael Jackson in a Billy Jean video. And when Trayvon Martin was shot and killed in cold blood and his killer was allowed to go home with his murder weapon and protests were being held all over the country, Mr. Obama’s rather benign comment that if he had a son he would look like Trayvon, his political critics again pounced on him calling the President a race baiter as they did their best to inject race into the matter as they rallied support for the black teenager’s murderer.
But all of that happened prior to Mr. Obama being reelected for his second term as commander-in-chief. Now that he’s been reelected and is no longer eligible to run for the highest office in the land again, Mr. Obama is a little freer to express himself more openly about issues of race. Before being reelected he would do his best to quell the specter of racism by saying that he didn’t think race was a factor in any happenings no matter how racially charged. But if Mr. Obama’s latest venture into the unwelcomed discussion of America’s racial dysfunction that many loath to have is any indication, things might be a little different now from the President’s perspective.
Six days after a six women jury acquitted George Zimmerman of any wrong doing in his assassination of Trayvon Martin the President surprised the White House reporters by appearing before them during a routine press conference being conducted by Press Secretary Jay Carney. Unprompted and unscripted the President extended his sympathies to the parents of Trayvon Martin. The President actually empathized with the murdered teenager saying that he could’ve been Trayvon thirty five short years ago. Thirty five years ago a young Barack Obama could have been murdered as he was walking home minding his own business and somebody thought it a good idea to snuff his life out and his murderer could’ve been acquitted because young Barry foolishly thought he could rebel against the establishment like so many other teenagers do, black and white.
Mr. Obama talked about how people responded to him in his earlier years by locking their car doors as he walked through the neighborhood, by people crossing the street as he walked towards them on the sidewalk, by women clutching their purse closer to their body as he got onto an elevator, and by being followed through a department store as if he would shoplift at any moment compelled to do so driven by his black skin. Mr. Obama knows all too well that being black is not even close to being some kind of benefit in our social construct. It is a curse that makes it possible for a black teenager to be murdered in the darkness of the evening.
Mr. Obama is ready to talk about his racism of the past. But he still needs to acknowledge the racism he continues to experience to this day. How else can anyone explain how the most powerful man in the free world is constantly hounded to produce his birth certificate as proof that he belongs in America and is eligible to serve as President unlike every single President that has come before him who were all accepted to be a citizen without question? Even though he doesn’t have to run for office again he still needs the support of the American people in order to do his job and hold his political opponents at bay. And the last thing America wants is to support any black person who is willing to say that they can’t do their job because of the racism that runs rampant in this country. Too many people are too ready to dismiss claims of racism as little more as whining in order to cover incompetence. Pull yourself up by your bootstrap is the knee jerk, overly simplistic response to racism regardless if it can be proven or not. The question is can you prove it beyond a shadow of doubt. And for many people, that shadow is so long it can never be overcome.
Americans want to hear that everything is good and racism is in our past or at least it’s getting better. In fact, Mr. Obama said as much when he gave his impromptu press conference. Despite our racial dysfunction, Mr. Obama says he looks at his daughters and their friends and comforts himself with the belief that things have gotten better and will continue to improve with time. We believe things have gotten so much better that we don’t even recognize the horrible fact that nothing’s changed. Just like Emmett Till was murdered way back in 1955 accused of doing something unseemly and paying for it with his life, Trayvon Martin was murdered today under accusations of attacking the man who was stalking him. Just like black people testified about what happened to Emmett Till and were dismissed, according to juror B-37 Rachel Jeantel’s testimony was dismissed as unreliable because of her lack of proper diction and the fact that she wasn’t properly educated. It’s a fair bet that the fact that she was black had something to do with her lack of credibility as well. Just like back then somebody got away with murder even though he was standing right there with the gun in his hand.
Things might look like they’re getting better. But the simple fact that to this day we continue to let our black children die and their murderers walk free proves that it isn’t getting any better at all. In fact, if you add the lies that things have gotten better, the deception of racial equality that we live under, things are far worse now than they’ve ever been. Back in Emmett Till’s day black people knew that they were second class citizens and no amount of sugar coating about how black people weren’t slaves anymore was going to make it better. Our measure for discrimination is not how good or bad our ancestors and elders had it. The measure for racial discrimination is the fact that we still do not live in a racially equal society. Our black children will continue to die until we wake up and recognize this simple fact and really begin to do something about it.
These fucking punks always get away. Those were the words from George Zimmerman as he jumped out of his car with a loaded weapon tucked into his trousers as he chased down Trayvon Martin to keep his community safe and, if necessary, kill the young black teenager. The plethora of evidence proved George Zimmerman guilty of murder and proved he lacked any credibility to explain what went down. And yet, somehow a jury of his peers acquitted him of any charges and found him not guilty.
The jury was made of six women, five white and one Hispanic or African American. They deliberated for about nineteen hours over two days before coming back with their verdict. In the end, these women felt that the prosecutor didn’t prove their case and/or the defense created enough reasonable doubt to believe that despite everything they heard and saw that Mr. Zimmerman may have been justified with killing Trayvon Martin that night.
Frankly, their verdict was no surprise in the land of the free that is built on a solid foundation of racial discrimination born of our forefather’s willingness to condone the enslavement of black people to serve as beast of burden for white people. Black people were considered only three-fifths human from the beginning. And without ever taking any serious steps to correct the racial imbalance that became engrained into our culture before our nation even existed, we continue to exist as a nation that tolerates and condones many forms of racial prejudice.
Today, many people are defending the verdict from these six women with excuses like this case was complicated or these people had a tough job to do or the legal bar for this case was set so impossibly high for the prosecution. But the problem with all of these excuses is that if we flip the racial roles, if George Zimmerman was black and Trayvon Martin was white, would we have had the same outcome and let a black man get away with the murder of a white teenager.
Case in point, John White was a black man in Long Island, New York who was convicted of shooting and killing seventeen year old Daniel Cicciaro, Jr. Young Daniel Cicciaro was drunk when he got a posse of his friends together in order to go to John White’s house and fight his son over a girl. John White stood in front of his house with a gun to confront the drunken posse armed with baseball bats and other weapons. Instead of retreating, Daniel Cicciaro continued to threaten the White family. John White wound up fatally shooting the teenager. He was arrested and charged that night. Instead of being confronted with complicated case with a high legal bar to overcome, the jury experienced no trouble finding John White guilty of second degree murder. Daniel was armed and had used racial epithets in his rants against the White family and was threatening the White family with violence and John White was found guilty.
Trayvon was unarmed minding his own business when George Zimmerman ran after him with a loaded weapon while referring to Trayvon as a fucking punk and an asshole. He kills the boy and is told he was free to go home with his murder weapon. He isn’t even arrested until forty-five days after the killing. But then he’s found innocent. Anybody wants to guess why the hundred-and-eighty degree discrepancy?
And please don’t say some lame shit like the laws are different between New York and Florida. Florida is the same state where Martin Anderson was sentenced to boot camp for taking a family member’s car without permission. Within hours of arriving at camp he is murdered by the camp guards. No one was found guilty of any wrong doing. New York is the same state where Sean Bell was murdered the morning of his wedding day. An undercover police officer saw Sean Bell and pulled his gun out mistaking the man for someone else. Sean Bell died in a hail of bullets. No one is found guilty. The state where the law is being applied has zero to do with anything.
These six women may have had a difficult job to do. They had to put aside their racial bias and actually make a decision on whether the white Hispanic George Zimmerman was guilty for the murder of black Trayvon Martin. Many court room pundits thought that these women were mothers and would actually think about the ramifications if it was their kid that was murdered by some neighborhood watchman while walking home. That’s a hard thing to do when you suffer from an inherent racial discrimination against black people that is so ingrained into your psyche that you cannot recognize it or you simply refuse to recognize it. In the end, those six women decided their racial fear of and animosity against black people outweighs their instincts as mothers.
In the end these women decided that they were more concerned with the protection of the racial status quo than the need for justice for a scary black boy. And people like George Zimmerman, those fucking punks always get away with it. More often than not they will get away with their assault on the black community.
The extent of America’s racial prejudice against black people knows no bounds. A black teenager going home in the darkness of a rainy night, minding his own business, is attacked by a vigilante neighborhood watch commander with a loaded gun. And in the process of the teenager defending himself he is murdered by the man who admitted to police that he was stalking the teenager. The police that arrived on the scene interviewed the murderer and then allowed him to go home with his murder weapon citing no evidence to contradict his story that he was attacked and had to defend himself from an unarmed teenager who never had any encounter with the law. It wasn’t until people protested en masse the obvious travesty of injustice that the prosecutors in Florida got off their duff and investigated this murder for the crime it truly was. It took weeks, more than a month even, for the murderer to be held accountable and face a court of his peers for his reckless actions the night he killed an unarmed teenager.
Yesterday George Zimmerman was found not guilty for the murder of Trayvon Martin. Really, who’s surprised?
Court pundits are brushing off the verdict with the excuse that the state prosecutors failed to meet the bar necessary to prove their case. There wasn’t enough evidence. The smoking gun in Mr. Zimmerman’s hands that night simply wasn’t smoking enough. The lies and inconsistent stories told by Mr. Zimmerman in all the interviews he gave after the shooting did nothing to damage the credibility of his claims. And the fact that an unarmed black teenager was shot in the dark by a white man who admitted on the phone to police that he was following the boy for no other reason than he looked like he was up to no good walking home the way he was walking in his black skin. There just wasn’t enough evidence to convict.
The fact remains that George Zimmerman made assumptions of Trayvon Martin and the black teenager paid for those assumptions with his life. George Zimmerman made the choice to call police to report a suspicious person in his neighborhood and give recorded testimony over the phone about his actions in the past, present, and evidence of his intent in the near future. We heard Mr. Zimmerman on tape indicating his intent to stop another asshole from getting away as he was running after the boy. We know that when he was running after the boy he had a loaded gun. George Zimmerman created the series of events that led to the death of Trayvon Martin. It didn’t matter to any of the jurors that a grown man with a loaded weapon was following an unarmed black teenager in the dark going home after a nonchalant trip to the store for Skittles and iced tea.
Regardless of all the things that we all know as fact, the Zimmerman defense was the belief that there’s enough reasonable doubt to suspect that it was Trayvon Martin who attacked George Zimmerman and created the series of events that led to his death. The only evidence they had on their side to support this theory was the fact that Trayvon Martin was black. He had photos on the internet showing him with his shirt off, both middle fingers up with a grill in his teeth being stupid. A Facebook post is all it takes to give people enough reasonable doubt that a black kid did not deserve to be murdered while minding his own business.
The fact of the matter is that in our society a grown man packing a gun and hunting black people is a lot more acceptable than a black unarmed teenager in a hooded jacket minding his own business. Today, this morning, the simple truth we know is true has been reinforced one again. Just being black in these United States is a crime punishable by death. Black people need to realize the fact that we are unwitting and unwilling collaborators in a culture that demeans and devalues black people. A murdered black teenager has far less of a chance for justice in the United States than a fucking dog. Just go ask Michael Vick.
This morning, I am made even more aware that my son is no safer today than if he was born a hundred years ago in the Jim Crow south. We have a twenty first century real life reenactment of the court scene from To Kill a Mockingbird when the white prosecutor drives home the point that the defendant was black and therefore guilty of his crime despite the overwhelming amount of evidence that proved he was innocent. That evidence could not overcome people’s prejudice that black people are not trustworthy and black people are criminals no matter what.
This morning there are a plenty of comments going back and forth over the verdict. Many people recognize this injustice for what it is. Many people celebrate the verdict as an affirmation that our justice system works. Some people are truly jubilant of the outcome. I suspect that the celebration is for no other reason than the verdict reaffirms their racial identity of cultural superiority. If Trayvon Martin has simply gone home that night he would have lived another day. Let’s not forget that he was going home until George Zimmerman stopped him. He shouldn’t have worn a hooded jacket, the way many kids these days where hooded outfits especially when it’s raining. The clothing he wore didn’t matter because his skin would remain black. If Trayvon wore a tuxedo he would have been just as suspicious. The point is that the excuses don’t matter because the only thing that matters is that Trayvon was black.
Trayvon Martin was lynched that night. Somebody saw a black kid and that kid became a symbol of everything that had ever gone wrong in their neighborhood. In an instant, he became a symbol of all the crime that had gone unsolved in the area. There was no obvious explanation for him being there, so he didn’t belong and had to be stopped at all cost. And after he was stopped and it was revealed that he did belong there and he wasn’t a threat, people refused to acknowledge that he was a victim of somebody’s racism. There is no racism. If he had only behaved in a way that would have been less threatening. If only he had submitted. If only he had stayed in his place and answered the man’s questions with a yes sir or a no sir or a sir at the end of every answer demanded of him. And when a black person doesn’t submit, the consequences rest squarely on their shoulders no matter the outcome.
Friday, July 25, 2013
Juror B-29, otherwise known as Maddy, said George Zimmerman got away with murder and god is watching him. God also watched her and five other women let him walk when they could’ve done something about him.
Sunday, July 14, 2013
It’s been a while. I’ve gotten to the point that the normal bullshit associated with our mutually assured social dysfunction just doesn’t warrant much time spent writing about it. I’ve gotten to a point I’ve got better things to do and not enough people care about things anyway. Our social machine is on cruise control and nothing anybody says is going to change its direction in any meaningful way unless a terrorist bomb goes off during a high profile social function. And even then, even if people do suddenly care, corporate America and their lobbyists will do whatever has to be done to keep the status quo. How else can you explain the response to the Sandy Hook murders when twenty children are gunned down, ninety percent of Americans want some form of gun control, and somehow nothing changes?
But earlier this week I heard the news about a rogue section of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) had targeted some conservative groups for extra scrutiny when they applied for tax exempt status. If memory serves correctly, a quarter of three hundred applications were for groups with the words “tea party” or “patriots” in their title and now a we have a new scandal that ranks right up there with Susan Rice doing her best to cover up the consulate attack in Benghazi in order to keep President Barack Obama employed in the White House. Were any laws broken? No. Was anybody’s application for tax exempt status denied because they had the previously mentioned words in their name? No. They simply had to suffer the indignity of having extra scrutiny.
Now at first glance that might sound unreasonable or unfair. Just like I know a lot of people think it’s unreasonable and unfair for police to pull over cars with non white drivers for a little extra scrutiny. We all know nobody goes to jail for being black. It’s just that the extra scrutiny a black driver gets can uncover something a little fishy or in their history that might warrant a trip downtown where they can answer a few more questions or wait until their story checks out. As a society we can tolerate that extra scrutiny because we like to operate under the assumption that black people warrant a little more watching because some bullshit statistics somewhere can show that black people are more criminally oriented. Never mind the fact that legally we are supposed to be free from illegal searches or seizure. As a society we think it’s far better to violate a non white person’s rights to privacy as long as he or she is not white. How else can we explain the fervor over white people being targeted for scrutiny?
Now, it’s a logical assumption that groups with the words “tea party” in their title are composed of people who have decided to make a political statement about paying less taxes than whatever they do pay. These people are the same ones who promote the idea that the size of our federal government needs to be checked regardless of how big it might be or who it serves. The best way to check government is to check its funding. So if these people are the ones applying to be exempted from taxes lord knows it’s probably good idea to make sure they’re legit. Maybe these people need to be asked a few more questions just to make sure their story checks out and everything is on the up and up. Besides, unlike the poor minority that might get pulled over for nothing more than being the wrong skin color, if things go wrong during extra scrutiny about a tax exemption application never involve anything remotely resembling a stay in a jail cell until the matter gets straightened out. If anybody had to choose one form of scrutiny over another I’m pretty sure most would chose the tax application.
Nevertheless, after all the news about seventy five groups getting more attention people want to pretend that life’s a really rabid bitch for political conservatives during the reign of Kommandant Barack Obama. Mr. Obama resembles President Richard Milhous Nixon in the way he brandishes the entire federal government to go after his enemies. And the way tea party patriots go out of their way to attack Mr. Obama it’s pretty obvious there’s reason to think Mr. Obama would do everything he can to get back at them, except for the fact that he doesn’t. But that fact won’t keep people from kicking up the dust and throwing tantrums about the abuses of power under this oppressive regime. Conservatives simply can’t catch a break as they continue their never ending pursuit to paint Mr. Obama as the worst tyrannical dictator this cursed world has ever seen. That, along with the idea that the IRS has been unceremoniously unleashed on conservatives, is simply bogus.
But that won’t keep people from playing the victim card saying that conservatives are being attacked left and right. It’s their political theme these days that includes things like the government wants to take our guns, we’re taxed enough already, we need to take our country back, forty seven percent of Americans are only takers, the only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun, we need to defend the traditional definition of marriage as one man and one woman, climate change is a hoax, Barack Obama was born in Kenya and is not constitutionally qualified to be in the White House, and all the other slogans that continues to permeates through media that are meant to infer some sense of conservative subjugation.
Friday, May 17, 2013
Again with Kahn? Did rebooting the Star Trek franchise mean rebooting the same old bad guys as well?
Colion Noir is an “urban gun enthusiast” and the latest spokesperson for the NRA. He is featured in a new television advertisement aimed primarily at the black community. The following snippet is the start of Mr. Noir’s spiel:
“No one wants to fight for their protection. They want the government to do it. The same government who at one point hosed us down with water, attacked us with dogs, and wouldn’t allow us to eat at their restaurants and told us we couldn’t own guns when bumbling fools with sheets on their heads were riding around burning crosses on our lawns and murdering us.”
Mr. Noir reminds people of the life of our ancestors and elders and their attempts to bring the nation’s attention to all of the racial inequality that black people had to deal with in the southern states prior to the civil rights era. Just imagine how the nation would have responded if instead of seeing peaceful black people being attacked by the white establishment intent on keeping black people in their place of second class citizenship, black people grabbed guns and started shooting it out with the white sheriffs, their deputies, and other law enforcement officers charged with keeping the peace with the weapons of their choice. Just imagine what life would have been like for the black community if they were to rise up en masse Nat Turner style and said enough was enough.
I would imagine that instead of the black community garnering national sympathy for their cause there would have been a swift and nearly universal condemnation of any black person who even looked like they participated in such civil unrest, which basically means any black person in the vicinity of the United States. In the vast majority of the public’s eyes, black people and guns is a volatile concoction that should never ever be allowed to mix. Any black person that raises a gun to defend his or her self from a white person is tempting fate whatever the circumstance. If anybody needs any convincing just ask the black John White who was convicted for murder the night he used a gun against the white seventeen year old and intoxicated Daniel Cicciaro, Jr. when the teenager got a drunken posse of four of his buddies to drive across town in order to teach Mr. White’s son Aaron a lesson for being accused of dishonoring a white girl as part of a joke that had gone totally and horribly wrong.
Black people with guns are a threat. Tell a white home owner that one of his neighbors is a black man and owns a gun and dude will probably make a beeline to the gun store to max out his Visa on all the weaponry that can fit in the back of his Ford pickup just so he can defend his self. In fact, the NRA’s executive vice president Wayne LaPierre has made statements warning law abiding people in the areas hit hardest by hurricane Sandy to prepare for a hellish world of overwhelmed if not totally collapsed law enforcement agencies and having to deal with roving gangs of armed minorities. In his eyes, it only makes sense that white people buy more guns to protect themselves from all the black people who are going to go out and buy guns. And if you don’t believe him just take a look at their new commercial featuring that black Mr. Noir.
However, Mr. Noir’s sales pitch is totally off base. A lot of people want to fight for their protection. A lot of people are fighting the good fight to keep guns out of the hands of people who should never have guns. Not every fight means you have to pick up a weapon with the intent of fighting to the death. Sometimes, the fight is one of politics, where people argue their point to convince the majority of what’s the right approach to a problem.
That’s the way our ancestors fought the good fight. It’s probably true that a lot of people wanted back in the civil rights movement wanted to meet violence with their own violence. But that would have done nothing but led to an escalation of violence that the black community, outnumbered and under armed, would have surely lost. Black people picking up guns in an attempt to inflict racial equality on a country chock full of white entitlement would have surely ended in disaster. Guns are not always the answer and many times they are the problem.
The answer for our ancestors and elders was actually government. More specifically it was a strong federal government that stepped into the picture to keep local and state government from trampling the rights of people in the black community. It was the federal government that told people stores and restaurants that they had to serve black people. It was the federal government that told the local sheriff that he couldn’t use fire hoses on black people. It was a strong federal government that passed the laws that protected black people’s right to attend schools previously reserved for white people. It was the threat of the federal government stepping in to enforce civil rights laws that made the local government step up to the plate for fear of having their authority revoked by a federal marshal. And if that wasn’t bad enough, the local heads of government could wind up under scrutiny of a federal investigation that could end with federal criminal charges.
Bottom line is that Mr. Noir has it all wrong. A lot of people want to fight for their protection. A lot of people want to fight to make sure that the government keeps its responsibility to its citizenry. The government that protects our rights isn’t the same government that hosed black people down. And if we aren’t careful and don’t remember that fact, the governments that did abuse black people will be back. It will be like they never left.
I never did care to follow the satirical magazine The Onion. I’ve always heard, read people referring to this publication as funny and/or clever and/or genius and/or witty and/or whatever. I may have actually tried to absorb its comedy a handful of times. But I’ve always come away from my effort with the opinion that I just wasted my time. The humor of The Onion ranked right up there with the Doonesbury comic or the Tonight Show with Johnny Carson reruns. It might be good for a half hearted chuckle, but whoever thinks this was class leading funny really has a strange sense of humor.
I was never under the impression that I was a member of the target entertainment market for the Tonight Show with Johnny Carson or the Doonesbury comic strip. That kind of humor was primarily geared to white people. And so I have to assume that The Onion is so geared as well. How else would anybody take using Twitter to call a nine year old girl, a black girl caught up in the rapture that comes with being nominated for an Oscar, a cunt? Then again, this is the kind of bullshit that passes for funny at The Onion.
Now maybe it’s just a coincidence that someone would use such a vile word that is used as a reference to a woman’s most significant sexual organ, a word historically used to demean the female gender, as part of a tasteless public joke about a totally inoffensive little black girl. Maybe the author really didn’t mean to be so disgusting and thought that he or she was just participating in some clean wholesome fun. It may have been just the type of thoughtless banter that appears anonymously on the internet. But it’s also the type of thoughtless bullshit that should make people think twice about what type of company or agency or person or entity they give their blind support to.
What type of person would call a little black girl a cunt? Why would somebody give such an offensive person a platform to spew such depraved slander? Why would I want to associate myself with either? Those are the types of self reflecting questions everyone needs to be asking of his or her self.
Instead, in typical “it happened to a black person so what does it matter” fashion, people came to the defense of The Onion saying that it was only a joke so we should all just forget about it. And if that was true then we would just put it behind us. But what if the joke was about one of the children murdered in the Sandy Hook shooting, would some of us be so quick to dismiss the offense with a nonchalant wave of the hand? Some of us probably would. But I’m betting that some people who weren’t the least bit offended about the reference to Beasts of the Southern Wild star Quvenzhane Wallis would see the “joke” in a different context. Are a bunch of dead primarily white children more deserving of respect and sensitivity than a single black girl winning an Oscar? Those Sandy Hook kids are dead while Quvenzhane Wallis has to live the rest of her life with what happened to her that night.
There is little doubt that my comparison with the children of Sandy Hook will offend some. Regardless of how much I might explain that I’m not trying to be rude to anybody but am simply trying to get people to expand their sense of compassion there will be people who will be greatly offended merely by my suggestion. People will write comments about how vulgar and impolite I am. I welcome the chance to enter an intelligent dialogue if somebody is willing to discuss, but I’m sure most comments will simply be deleted.
But the point is that if such people chose they will have an opportunity to confront the author, me, about what I wrote. The writer of the original cunt joke hides behind a wall of anonymity with The Onion’s name written all over it. The powers that be at The Onion may have apologized for the “joke”, but they have also made the decision to protect the identity of the joker like the hooded white sheet protects the identity of a klan member. We simply should trust their word when they say that the joker will be appropriately disciplined. They might keep their word, but there is really no way to verify it.
If The Onion wants to make sure the author is appropriately disciplined they should out the person who wrote it. Let him or her apologize to Ms. Wallis first and foremost, let him or her apologize to their fellow employees at The Onion, and then let him or her apologize to the world for putting their sick little tweet out in the public. Let it be known that The Onion truly doesn’t tolerate such loathing even it if was meant to be disguised as comedy. Let The Onion truly take a stand for integrity and give people the ability to verify it. Otherwise, this publication will continue to look like nothing anybody should be bothering to read in a useless attempt to find something truly funny.