brotherpeacemaker

It's about our community and our spirituality!

Is This Thing On?

Jesse Jackson should have known better. He whispered over to his co-guest, Doctor Reed Tuckson, making a few choice words about Barack Obama. Mr. Jackson knows better than most how some people would love nothing more than to catch him in an unguarded moment. His voice was low. He knew what he was saying could be very embarrassing if it was ever made public. He knew his words would come back to haunt him if the cat was let out the bag. But Mr. Jackson could not help himself. After going on record to give his politically correct assessment of Mr. Obama’s comments about the black community and about black men in particular, when he thought the camera and microphone were off line, Mr. Jackson made a rather base comment about Mr. Obama talking down to black people and how Mr. Jackson wanted to castrate the presumptive Democratic nominee.

Now, everybody who’s anybody is coming down on Mr. Jackson and his hate of Mr. Obama. One black pundit made the comment that Mr. Obama’s sermon on black fathers must have hit a little close to Mr. Jackson’s home since he has his own child born out of wedlock. Somebody else made the comment that Mr. Jackson is simply jealous of Mr. Obama’s popularity or his ability to actually become the nation’s first black president when Jesse Jackson’s campaign fell insignificantly short. Other people made the comment that this is just more evidence of the dysfunctional nature of the black community and/or the Democratic Party. Even Mr. Jackson’s son has distanced himself from his father’s comments. But is anybody thinking that this is just the latest off the cuff opinion of a black man who happened to have been offended by another black man who made disparaging remarks about the black community?

Mr. Obama and his wife Michelle have two beautiful girls, Sasha and Malia. I can imagine the Obamas throwing a birthday party for one of their daughters and asking some high profile person that their girls admire to make an appearance and say something to commemorate the occasion. I can also imagine that high profile person going to the birthday party and saying something about how little black girls need to learn responsibility and quit getting pregnant without getting married. Any little girl can be a fool and become a mother. But getting knocked up doesn’t make a black girl a black woman. All it will do is ruin her life and the lives of her family members. We don’t need to contribute to the statistics that say black girls are known for their whorish behavior. Black girls need to be focused on their future and the future of the black community.

Chances are pretty good that Mr. and Ms. Obama wouldn’t appreciate someone making such statements at his daughter’s birthday party. Although there is a popular belief that black girls are more likely to get pregnant and be somebody’s baby mama, why in the world would someone make such accusations of the Obama girls? Mr. Obama would be offended and would probably make a statement expressing his outrage and disappointment with such a topic at what should have been a happy occasion. And Mr. Jackson, a black man who does not work hard to distance himself from the black community, probably took offense that Mr. Obama reinforces such assumptions about black men and their irresponsibility to their children.

Ever since Mr. Obama made his infamous statements about the irresponsibility of black men and their lack of a commitment to their children, I have made it a point to notice all the black men in my black neighborhood who have taken responsibility for children in their lives. There was the black man who was walking through the alley holding a toddler’s hand. There was the black man carrying a bag of groceries in his left hand, holding a little girl’s hand with his right hand, while another slightly older girl skipped along behind them. There was the brother sitting at the bus stop with a baby in a stroller. In all these examples, it was a black man with a child or with children. But instead of these men being used to define the black experience, instead of the role of the black father being acknowledged, we prefer to focus our attention on the malfeasant.

It angers me to see the malfeasant that is the definition of black fathers on Father’s Day. It angers me that a former community organizer who happens to be black and should have an idea of the diversity of the black experience, is focused on the politically popular negative stereotypes of the black community while he panders to the wholesome image of the white community. And if it angers me, a black man who takes his responsibility to his black children, family, neighborhood, community, etcetera, it should not be too hard to imagine that it angers other black people as well. It should not be hard to imagine that it angers other black men such as Mr. Jackson.

Personally, I’m glad to see Mr. Jackson react strongly enough to make a suggestion, when he thought he was off camera, that he wanted to castrate Mr. Obama. Honestly, sometimes I feel like I would like to castrate him as well. But whether or not we agree with Mr. Jackson or not, instead of the black community supporting another black man caught on tape reacting to the negative image of black people promoted by the dominant community, we again turn away and utterly condemn another man who demonstrates a sincere concern of the black community. Mr. Jackson may have been vulgar and the vast majority of us would like to take him out back to the political tool shed.  A lot of people are disappointed and are saying that the Reverend Jesse Jackson, like the Reverend Jeremiah Wright, is just a bitter old man unable to let go of a bygone era. But personally, I understand Mr. Jackson’s frustration with Mr. Obama enough to say, at least off camera, that I’d like to buy him a set of heavy duty scissors.

Thursday, July 10, 2008 - Posted by | African Americans, Barack Obama, Black Community, Black Culture, Black People, Democrats, Fox News, Jeremiah Wright, Jesse Jackson, Life, Michelle Obama, News, Politics

6 Comments »

  1. I feel you Brother Peacemaker.

    You know, I am upset with Jackson’s choice of wording and the fact that he should have known better especially with the fact that he was on Fox News?

    However for me, I have decided that as crude as the inital comment was, there was truth and real frustration in what he said. He is not alone in that assessment of Mr.Obama. The both of us feel that way along with many others in the community. You pretty much said everything in this post as well as in your other post in regards to this topic.

    You see I grew up with a father in the home. I have grandfathers on both sides. I have plenty of uncles and cousins and friends who are all good black fathers. Truthfully in my experience growing up, I never knew of a black man who did not take care of his responsibility whether he was in the home or was not. The fact that I did not growing up is evidence that there is a more than siazble amount of black men in the community who take care of responsiblity and/or the household. I believe that it is the majority. One cannot look at statistics and feel that they understand what is going on. One cannot conclude that a single parent household equals a deadbeat dad because a man not living in the home whether it be due to divorce or other reasons does not automatically mean that he is not in his child’s life. Therefore Obama made an unfair sweeping assumption and reduced millions of Americans to a statistic.

    What kills me is that AA’s are cheering him on and stoning those who disagree with what he said back in June. It was not the first time he said such things in front of a black audience. The “popeyes chicken for breakfast” thing kills me everytime I hear it.

    Here is what I keep telling people. Whenever I ask for Obama to address issues that effect the black community disproportionately like I did in the Sean Bell verdict and police brutality, I was met with people telling me that Obama was not running for the president of black America. He was running for president of all Americans. So my question is why didn’t he address all Americans on Father’s Day rather than singling out blacks for his attack? (Of course I know the answer but here goes)

    * There is a 50% divorce rate in the white community. Why not equate their divorce rate with the idea that their children are being neglected or that they are morally bankrupt. I have many white friends and many grew up in broken homes due to divorce. In this country, there are technically and numerically more white single parent households than black. Why leave them out? Do you not care Obama?

    * You said this at one point, “Although there is a popular belief that black girls are more likely to get pregnant and be somebody’s baby mama”. Young Latino girls have that prize though popular belief is that black girls do. They have the heighest rates of teenage pregnancy and I believe that their illegtimacy rates are growing while those of black women have been dropping over the last 40 years. The teenage pregnancy rates of black girls have dropped 50%.
    Truthfully,where I live in NYC, if one wanted to make racist assumptions then they could easily conclude that Latino families are dysfunctional. However that would be a disrespectful and offensive assumtpion. You will never see a Latino politican nor public figure ever pubically ridicule or scold their respected community in that fashion. There is also not a big enough market for Latino pathology yet. The constant focus on what some call so called “bad black pathology” is to distract from the pervasiveness of instituionalized racism, social injustice and economic disparity. Whenever I hear that conversation come up in certain settings, I know better than to think that that person cares two licks about the black community. This is why I believe that Obama was not talking to US in that speech.

    This also brings me back to my inital question. If all what I wrote is true (which it is) why did Obama, the race neutral candidate who is not as I am constantly reminded running for president of Black America not address the breakdown of the family and “fatherhood” with all Americans. Doesn’t he care about the families of other races of Americans? Shouldn’t he? Isn’t he not running for the president of Black America? Why just us?

    It is a contradiction of his very platform and it also speaks to the prefered negative percpetion that Obama seems to have of the black community. He has often repeated some things about the AA community that are less than savory. He never brings all this “truth” to the white community. If he dares utter even the slightest bit of truth in their regard he is stoned by both whites and BLACKS. When he ridicules blacks, he is met with applauds and his given a gold medal. No star of the month from me.

    Father’s Day is a day of celebration. Lauding the millions of black men who are good fathers, role models and father figures would have been “change that I can believe in” from the usual rhetoric of the absentee black father. The absentee black father has come to define black fatherhood and it is not fair or okay with me. If a man by choice or by circumstance has dropped the ball on his responsiblity as a father…then he deserves no mention on Father’s Day because he is not a Father. When I hear people say that well…Obama did not need to mention them because that is what they should be doing in the first place, I get upset. If that is the case, then we should extend that outside of our community with Obama’s help and ban Father’s Day and Mother’s Day while we are at it since we are merely praising people for what they should be doing in the first place.

    What he essentially did on Father’s Day was singled out a group of men who are usually marginalized and maligned to publically ridicule. He decided to use the usual rhetoic and his speech was cliche. He also in that speech was talking to more than just absent black fathers. He was ridiculing black parents and people in general. I am still scratching my head as to why some people did not pick that up. He merely reinforced long held percpetions of black men and all black people as morally challenged, irresponsible and lazy. As an AA, I have a personal issue with that.

    Also I wanted to share both of these with you,

    1. Here is an article printed in Newsweek a month before Obama’s “speech”

    Newsweek article

    It pretty much discusses that there is nuance behind the statistical numbers coming out of our community. It also brings up the findings of a new study that pretty much confirm my inital conclusions. That a man in the home did not mean that he was not an active participant in his child’s life. The article actually says that a black father who is not in the home is more likely than other men of other races to be involved in his child’s life. This is good news and I was happy to hear that because I see it all around me. I also thought that the article was good at shedding light on the various reasons behind the black family breakdown which has historical roots and sociological explanations. It is not as simple as one would like to see it.

    2. Here is a political cartoon which pretty much explains how many Americans saw Obama’s speech. Nobody can say that this cartoon is not racist:

    Racist Pat Oliphant Cartoon

    It would be nice if the mainstream media, White America, delusional blacks and the Obama campaign knew that concern was not isolated to Jackson. It would probably help Obama if he knew that. My granfather who is a father of 8 children, 22 grandchildren, countless godchildren, 5 great grandchildren and a father figure said that he wanted to “backhand” Obama on Father’s Day dinner. It has nothing to do with age or the personal guilt because I am young, female and childless and was offended along with mostly everyone in my family. I just wish that Jackson could have used appropriate language and have given a better sound byte. What would have been better was if he was honest about his feelings in regards to Obama rather than grandstanding on Fox News. I would have applauded if he stood up and said that I disagree with Obama and I have on X,Y,Z issue. What he has unfortunately done is complicated a situation that did not have to be complicated. He has now moved any dissent coming from the black community is regards to Obama further to the margins. I am not upset at him though and I am not looking to tear him down like so many are. He has done a lot for civil rights and the AA community.

    Comment by rhondacoca | Thursday, July 10, 2008 | Reply

  2. Thanks for the feedback rhondacoca,

    You’ve made a lot of points that people should take timeout to consider. I especially like the question, “[W]hy didn’t he address all Americans on Father’s Day rather than singling out blacks for his attack?” when people try to counter with the rather weak argument that Barack Obama is trying to be the president of all Americans. In all honesty, it sounds more and more likely to me that Mr. Obama is trying to be the president of only white America.

    This whole ordeal with Jesse Jackson has really disappointed me. Mr. Jackson should have been more honest with the way he felt instead of trying to keep it on the down low with vulgar whispers. And now, rather conveniently, people can dismiss Mr. Jackson as being envious of Mr. Obama’s political success. Mr. Jackson, like the black community in general, can be categorized into the most simple of human emotions.

    Peace

    Comment by brotherpeacemaker | Friday, July 11, 2008 | Reply

  3. BrotherP,

    I personally don’t feel that the comment was all that vulgar. They should be glad they didn’t hear MY comments. They would have really had something to talk about.

    Anyhow, I agree with RhondaCoco this whole thing stinks of hypocrisy. He is the black presidential candidate when he wants to criticize us and spew propaganda about the black community. And he is the American presidential candidate for everyone when he doesn’t want to address issues or show his face at black events.

    Thanks for a great post.

    Comment by theblacksentinel | Friday, July 11, 2008 | Reply

  4. Thanks for the feedback theblacksentinel,

    Maybe it’s a guy thing. But anytime anyone starts talking about cutting off somebody’s nuts I think its pretty vulgar. I think everybody who recognized Mr. Obama’s offense to the black community made a pretty intense comment or two. If more celebrities like Mr. Jackson would come forward and make their anger more apparent when this type of thing happens the less likely Mr. Obama, and other people just like him, would feel free to make these stereotypical observations.

    Peace

    Comment by brotherpeacemaker | Friday, July 11, 2008 | Reply

  5. [...] Jesse Jackson was not artful but had a valid point. Now, everybody who’s anybody is coming down on Mr. Jackson and his hate of Mr. Obama. One black [...]

    Pingback by Post Swam Dog Remarks (no athletic content) « blueollie | Saturday, July 12, 2008 | Reply

  6. Barack Obama made the irresponsible comments. Father’s Day is a day of celebration. Can you imagine how responsible black men in America feel when they are constantly bombarded with statements that “all black men in America are absentee fathers, and the other numerous negative comments on the black race?” Obama is black when it is convenient. He is white when it is convenient. Actually, he is bi-racial. I think he truly identifies with the white race anyway. His father was African (from Kenya) and he grew up partially in Indonesia, and in America raised by his white mom and white parents. Obama did not have the African-American experience. He did not even grow up in the black middle-class environment. Obama had a vision. He wants to be the first person of color to become President of the US. I thought he was okay until I heard the “Popeye’s chicken for breakfast” remark, and then the disparaging remarks about “black men in America.” I grew up in a traditional two-family household. My whole neighborhood was comprised of responsible black families as homeowners. Isn’t it time to once again ignore the negative msm and get back to basics?

    Comment by marion | Sunday, July 20, 2008 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 116 other followers

%d bloggers like this: